European guy, weird by default.

You dislike what I say, great. Makes the world a more interesting of a place. But try to disagree with me beyond a downvote. Argue your point. Let’s see if we can reach a consensus between our positions.

  • 69 Posts
  • 3.41K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m not german but how about a big “no” for that genious suggestion?

    This type of idea puts me in such a state of mind I don’t even have the energy to curse.

    Listen to science. Actually listen to experts and learn that people produce more and better in shorter work days. Want more work hire more workers, plan activities better and automatize repetitive, predictable, tasks.

    Politians work for the people. The people owe them nothing. Stop trying to force socities back.



  • qyron@sopuli.xyzto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneParental rule:
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    That logic is completely adultered.

    There is a very small percentage of individuals that take for themselves and control resources they have no need for.

    Eliminate that and 90% of the problem is solved.

    And what is stopping people to adopt? Pride? Or perhaps an overzealous system?



  • In my country, jury duty can be refused and is deemed as a role, not an obligation. It is an honor, as it is very rare to have such added role in court; takes very complex and often serious crimes. People called for it often accept but I have heard of situations where people object from personal or moral values.

    And, again, in my country, voting is not an obligation, nor legal, nor moral. It is a right and the duty to vote is considered a matter of respect towards the right that was acquired through a revolution and the individual right to be part of the political destiny of the nation, no matter how small.

    Maybe I’m splitting hairs, here, but I don’t care.

    A duty arises from a personal sense of necessity to do something. Call moral obligation if it is easier for you. Being moral relative… Obligation is determined, enforced and enforceable by law.



  • You be the judge of it:

    • punched through a tempered, textured, 3mm thick glass, leading to several cuts on a hand and wrist
    • kicked a glass panel on a door and got a nasty cust on my toe
    • several instances of cutting myself on different types of thorny bushes
    • perforation with glasses rim on my eyebrow
    • severe cut on my other eyebrow, another on the bridge of my nose
    • broken arm, twice
    • fall from a 1st floor balcony, landing on a bush, after breaking a cabinet with my back and legs, until finally reaching the ground
    • hundreds, if not thousands, of small scrapes and bruises
    • bitten by dogs, leading to deep gouges, on my calves
    • severe tear on the back of my left hand, with a broken bone, not exposed, leading to surgery
    • many, many, many sprained ankles and wrists
    • three pulled teeth plus all the bleeding from losing my baby teeth
    • minor burns on hands and fingers, from cooking
    • several nasty cuts from kitchen knives and a perforation by a lobster spike, which led to a severe infection, with a piece of lobster shell stuck underneath a finger nail
    • a few near choking to death episodes
    • two electrocussion incidents (230V), for mere seconds


  • qyron@sopuli.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldI would like to go to there
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I disagree.

    The company would need to start differently, to settle the rules on how it would run it’s activities.

    First thing would be to set itself as a non-profit and a co-op.

    Even machinery purpose built to last requires maintenance, repair and parts to do so. A company focusing itself on producing quality appliances, with proper warranty (3 years minimal), repairable, upgradeable and with plenty of optional accessories, could be viable.

    Resorting to 3D printing to make parts in small scale/on order would remove a big part of the inventory management problem.


  • I’m going to risk there is none.

    Many hand to hand combat weapons were bespoke to the user.

    Using an example I’m fairly familiar with:

    In Portugal, we have a martial art called jogo do pau. It uses a simple wooden staff. Today’s schools insist the staff has a standard lenght, width and shape.

    An old school practitioner I had the pleasure to meet taught me the staff was always made to fit the wielder, not the opposite.

    As a general guide line, it should have the lenght of the distance from the wielder’s armpit to the ground but there would be people that prefered longer or shorter staffs. Some people would prefer thinner staffs, nearly cylindrical in shape, others would prefers heavier, thicker, almost eliptical in profile. The amount of customisation and variation capable of being put into the weapon itself was so diverse, it made each staff unique.

    I’d risk this same logic would apply to more classic weapons, like the flails you ask about.






  • I’m not against supporting a software in a recurring form but the web browser is essentially the lock and key of accessing the entirery of what exists outside your machine.

    That would garner an immense power to whichever entity developing one. Remember Microsoft and the IE case.

    Firefox is not perfect and apparently on a downwards spiral but what made it stand out was because it wanted to be free and for all. Chrome is far from being a good thing.